Senedd Cymru | Welsh Parliament
Bil Aelod Arfaethedig – Mark Isherwood AS | Proposed Member Bill - Mark Isherwood MS
Datblygu'r Bil Iaith Arwyddion Prydain (BSL) (Cymru) | Development of the British Sign Language (BSL) (Wales) Bill
Ymateb gan: Unigolyn | Evidence from: Individual
The British Sign Language Act 2022 requires the UK Government to issue guidance about the promotion and facilitation of the use of British Sign Language (BSL). This however only applies in England and not to the Welsh Government or public bodies in Wales such as councils or the NHS. The British Sign Language (BSL) (Wales) Bill aims to place equivalent specific duties on the Welsh Government and public bodies in Wales.
Yes, because without legislation nothing appears to change for the better. Access to education is not equitable (classes are in spoken language and interpreted by people who are not fluent in BSL - and exams are conducted through the medium of written Welsh or English). This results in a cycle of inequality and marginalisation. Teachers of the deaf are usually hearing and are not fluent in BSL, and there are very few deaf health professionals - both of which helps presents barriers to deaf people and perpetuates inequality.
Yes. That public institutions give equal status to BSL is a bear minimum.
Yes
Yes
Don't know.
There is no obvious distinction between user and signer. Users and signers could be either deaf or hearing.
Don't know.
I think that this distracts us from the point that BSL should have equal status to Welsh or English. Two points:
1) It should be up to the individual to decide whether they are deaf enough to find BSL helpful or not. This should not be the decision of a hearing professional's judgement.
2) We don't distinguish between 'properly' Welsh, Welsh speakers or 'properly' English, English speakers. We don't need professional certification of our mother tongue to be considered Welsh or English enough. We simply offer both languages, and now we should offer three.
Strongly disagree.
If they had, legislation would have happened a long time ago and there would be no barriers to accessing equal education and equal healthcare - and the number of deaf professionals in education and health would reflect the proportion in the community.
Strongly agree.
Because deaf people know what they need more than anyone else. Also, the very word 'service' suggests that the people providing it are the servants and the people receiving it know what they want.
Organisations need to be familiar with and able to provide video call BSL interpretation services for when interpreters can not be present in person. A strong focus should be placed on promoting BSL interpretation as a career as we have too few at present.
Education; Health; Social Care.
The Bill proposes to establish a BSL Commissioner who would promote and facilitate the use of BSL, and would have the same powers as other minority language Commissioners such as in the Welsh Language (Wales) Measure 2011.
Yes
Yes, but the main input and the main decision-makers should be from the deaf community
Yes
Enabling deaf users/signers to lead the development of policies and implementation of services for BSL users/signers; Early years language support for deaf children and their families; Improving BSL provision in education; Access to interpreters in public services. These points work together as a whole.
On the point of language support for children and their families, this should be local and government funded. My family had to travel long distances and pay hundreds of pounds that we couldn't afford in order to learn BSL and provide my deaf grandson with language from the outset.
Yes.
I can't see any other way of monitoring its progress towards fulfilling its duties.
With regard to the production of health videos in BSL, care should be taken to reinforce the legal concept of medical consent so that deaf people know that they have options, can accept or decline any offer of medical care (test, examinations, procedures or treatments) and that their decision will be respected and supported. This includes making detailed evidence-based information about all the options available in BSL. I would like to see NICE guidance in BSL forms to as this would become an invaluable reference point for patients and for deaf medical students alike.